Weekly Roundup 09/18/26 (Clarity fails to advance, Caroline Ellison's new job, AI leaking MNPI, Poland's oil snafu) (EP.740)
The discussion spans stalled crypto legislation, committee advances on crypto tax and Bitcoin-reserve bills, and new SEC flexibility for limited tokenized-stock trading. It also examines stablecoin yields, tokenized Tesla-share fragmentation, and concerns about inside information entering AI models, alongside funding announcements and a federal quantum-computing prize. Separate discussions address AI liability and oversight, while the speakers question the circumstances around a Venezuelan oil deal and Caroline Ellison's new job.
Preview · 13 more points in the app
Read the Full SummaryKey Takeaways
The Clarity Act debate remains unresolved: a Senate cloture vote failed 49–50, while a House committee advanced separate crypto tax and strategic Bitcoin reserve bills. One speaker expects those bills to wait until after the midterms, though another says rulemaking on key Clarity Act provisions could meet much of the industry’s needs; with the bill’s failure leaving the status quo in place, stablecoin providers could continue paying yield, and Coinbase increased its stablecoin yield.
Crypto and stablecoin businesses drew capital alongside the launch of new infrastructure: Tari raised $13 million, Velocity raised $10 million, and Fin.com raised $20 million, while Circle launched its Arc blockchain with BlackRock, DTCC, ICE, Mastercard, and Visa among the validators. The funding spans on-chain credit and stablecoin payments and infrastructure, while Arc is built for stablecoin finance.
The AI regulation discussion included a host’s comparison between a large closed-source lab’s push for rules favoring a handful of major labs and an earlier effort to restrict DeFi. Another host argued that existing product-liability law and criminal prohibitions already apply when an AI model commits crimes, while also criticizing Dario’s reported proposal for bank-style oversight by an organization closely affiliated with and financially intertwined with the supervised firm.
GEO-POLITICS
“He really tried to ram market structure through that would have just killed DeFi. Yeah. It was clarity before Clarity and it was really obnoxious.”—
“So compare it to, you know, a large closed source frontier lab effectively arguing that open weight AI shouldn't exist and that the government should be involved in regulating a…”—
“So the house has apparently moved forward on two other crypto bills. The house committee advanced a federal crypto tax framework, the digital asset tax certainty act…”—
TECHNOLOGY
“First one up is Tari. This is an on chain credit platform. They raised $13,000,000 from Blockchain Capital, Janus Henderson, and Strobe.”—
“Velocity is a stablecoin payments company. They raised 10,000,000 from Han, Miran Ventures, Circle Ventures, and others.”—
“Fin.com is a stablecoin infrastructure company that raised $20,000,000 from XBA and Coinbase Ventures.”—
ECONOMY
“I think our current framework works fine for what Dario is saying, frankly, you know, product liability is a thing…”—
“And if you want oversight, he was asking to be regulated the way banks are, but then he wanted the supervisory organization to be, like, closely affiliated firm that they…”—
MARKETS
“So the bank lobby had this at the place where these brokerages that do stablecoins can't pay yield. And since the bill didn't go through, it's status quo…”—
“I don't know if this is solvable at the regulatory layer, but have you ever looked up tokenized Tesla stock or something on any of the major blockchains?…”—

AI Liability Debate
The hosts argue existing product and civil liability can address harmful AI behavior, criticize Dario Amodei's proposed oversight structure, and compare his approach to Sam Bankman-Fried's regulatory ambitions.
Crypto Funding Deals
The hosts review several crypto funding announcements and discuss renewed interest in collectibles, especially trading cards, as one host reflects on his own collection.
Clarity Act Stalls
The hosts say the Senate Clarity Act vote failed amid election-year politics and disagreements over ethics and developer protections, while noting the stablecoin-yield restrictions remain unresolved.
SEC Tokenization Rules
The SEC's temporary exemption could enable limited tokenized-stock trading, but the hosts warn that fragmented issuers, prices, and liquidity need coordination and safeguards.
Crypto Tax And Reserve Bills
House committees advanced crypto tax and Bitcoin-reserve proposals; the hosts welcome a small-transaction exemption but question taxing staking rewards before holders sell.
GPU Pricing Data Scrutiny
The hosts question the Commerce Department's national-security rationale for asking a company to remove NVIDIA GPU-rental price data, calling economic-data censorship un-American.
Insider Trading And Ellison
The hosts criticize Robinhood engineers accused of trading on listing information, then discuss Caroline Ellison's new role at an effective-altruism nonprofit connected to disputed FTX funding.
MNPI Inside AI Models
The hosts consider whether confidential information used to train AI models could create insider-trading liability, concluding that misuse may be difficult to prove but could enable plausible deniability.
Poland's Venezuelan Oil Deal
The hosts recount reports that a Polish state oil group paid $230 million in Tether for Venezuelan oil that never arrived, and question the sanctions evasion and lack of recourse.
Quantum Computing Prize
A new $215 million federal prize aims to accelerate fault-tolerant quantum computing; the hosts discuss cryptographic risks, historical codebreaking, and AI's potential to advance quantum research.
Crypto Rulemaking Outlook
The hosts doubt Congress will quickly revive Clarity Act talks and expect regulatory agencies to address many of the bill's key provisions instead.
Related Episodes

Important Disclaimers
Not Investment Advice: For education only — not financial, tax or legal advice.
AI-Generated: Made by AI from source transcripts and may contain errors.
No Guarantees: Past performance does not predict future results; investing carries risk.
Our Commentary · Request Removal