Why Rubio Skipped Brussels: America’s Secret Ring Around Europe & How it will Impact Portfolios

Brent Johnson frames the U.S. posture as a shift away from the rules-based order and considers how that could reshape its global engagement, including a possible ring of alternative outposts around Europe and growing Arctic competition. He also discusses the U.S. confrontation with the International Criminal Court, its jurisdiction and funding, and sanctions that could lead to court challenges, European protections for companies, or a negotiated deal. He argues that the broader use of U.S. power can affect markets, while the market snapshot showed the Nasdaq and Dow near records, the VIX below 15, and oil in the low $90s.

Preview · 9 more points in the app

Read the Full Summary

Key Takeaways

Brent Johnson argues that the United States is moving away from the rules-based order toward an America First posture, citing Marco Rubio’s description of the postwar order as obsolete and the international system as broken. He says U.S.-China competition will continue through cooperation and antagonism, with Arctic trade routes, Russian military installations, submarine monitoring, and critical minerals and technology components making the region increasingly important.

Johnson describes Iceland as a potential partner for closer defense cooperation, while saying the United States has no intention of entering the country without its approval. He also raises the possibility—not a confirmed plan—that the United States could rely on alternative outposts such as the Azores, Lisbon, or Portugal if traditional European bases are less dependable, and points to Greece’s gas-hub role and $4 billion in F-35 and F-16 purchases as evidence of its strategic importance.

Johnson says the ICC can prosecute individuals, including non-member nationals for conduct on a participating country’s territory, while the United States has long opposed its authority over U.S. citizens; the court’s founding proposal passed 120–7, with the United States among the opposing votes. He also notes that the court has a roughly $200 million budget, receives no U.S. contribution, and gets almost half its funding from Japan, Germany, the United Kingdom, and France combined.

MARKETS

Market Snapshot — U.S. markets ended near all-time highs. The host says the Nasdaq and Dow hit records before a slight late-week pullback. The VIX closed below 15, while oil was in the low $90s.

“Financial markets in the United States finished near their all-time high again this week with both the Nasdaq and the Dow, I believe, making all-time highs before pulling back just…”—

ICC

ICC Jurisdiction — Johnson describes the International Criminal Court as an institution that investigates and tries individuals, rather than governments, for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and crimes of aggression. He says its jurisdiction can extend to non-member nationals for conduct committed on the territory of a participating country.

“I mean essentially what the International Court is it's it's an institution that tries people, not governments. It's not like the United Nations…”—

U.S. Opposition — Johnson says the United States has opposed the court's authority over U.S. citizens, arguing they should be subject to U.S. law. He says the court's founding proposal passed 120–7, with the United States among the seven opposing votes.

“Now the US has always kind of pushed back on this because they have they have said that the United States citizens should not be subject to international court…”—

ICC Funding — Johnson says the court has a budget of about $200 million and that the United States has never contributed. He says Japan, Germany, the United Kingdom, and France together cover almost half its funding.

“and with the US, China, Russia on the outside you know four members basically Japan, Germany, United Kingdom and France cover almost half of the funding or you know who…”—

U.S.-STRATEGY

America First Shift — Brent Johnson argues that the United States is moving away from the rules-based order toward an America First posture, substantially changing how it engages with the world. He cites Secretary of State Marco Rubio's statements that the post-war order is obsolete and the international system is broken as expressions of this shift.

“And as part of that big picture, we've been making the case for many years now that we are in a transition from the former rules-based order to an America…”—

Arctic Competition — Brent Johnson says U.S.-China competition will persist through periods of cooperation and antagonism, with the Arctic becoming an increasingly important arena. He cites opening northern trade routes, monitoring Russian submarines before they enter the Atlantic, Russian military installations on the northern coast, and critical minerals and technology components as reasons for the region's strategic significance.

“We think this is all part of this great power competition between the United States and China. We don't think that that is going to go away anytime soon…”—

Iceland Outpost — Johnson says Rubio described Iceland as a critical outpost and said Iceland and the United States were open to closer defense cooperation. Johnson notes there had been no buildup and says closer cooperation would not surprise him. He also says the United States had no intention of entering Iceland without its approval.

“So, you know, while he was there in Iceland, Rubio said that it's a critical outpost and that Iceland and the United States were open to a closer defense cooperation…”—

Markets And Rubio's Message

The host notes equities near records, low volatility, and oil in the low $90s, then argues Rubio's Greece speech signals a consequential shift in U.S. posture.

America-First Order

The host sees a long-running move from a cooperative, rules-based global order toward deglobalization and a more unilateral America-first approach, with broad political and market consequences.

U.S. Outposts Around Europe

The host suggests Iceland, Portugal's Azores, Greece, and Poland could form an alternative network of U.S. access as traditional European basing arrangements face uncertainty.

International Criminal Court

The host explains the ICC's jurisdiction, structure, and membership, emphasizing that the United States is not a member and does not contribute to its funding.

U.S. Pressure On The ICC

The host describes past U.S. cooperation with the court when useful, then details sanctions and argues the ICC lacks the power to withstand U.S. pressure.

ICC Outcomes And Market Signals

Possible court challenges, European protections for companies, and a negotiated deal could shape the dispute; the host says U.S. power and troop decisions bear watching for market implications.

Important Disclaimers

Not Investment Advice: For education only — not financial, tax or legal advice.

AI-Generated: Made by AI from source transcripts and may contain errors.

No Guarantees: Past performance does not predict future results; investing carries risk.

Our Commentary · Request Removal