The Bond Market Is Trapping The Fed | Weekly Roundup
The episode examines how AI investment, political backlash, and midterm uncertainty are shaping the economic outlook. It focuses on inflation risks from energy prices and policy choices, with market-implied Fed hike odds rising to roughly 70% after the PPI print. Bond-market stress, higher long-end yields, crowded semiconductor positioning, and potential leadership rotation frame the market discussion, while forecasts include inflation reaching 4%, 5%, or 6% and a possible recessionary reaction to three hikes alongside $120 oil.
Preview · 19 more points in the app
Read the Full SummaryKey Takeaways
AI infrastructure investment is decelerating but remains a main economic driver, even as negative public messaging and shifting polls are weakening political support for data centers. The backlash is already reaching governors and midterm candidates who were previously supportive.
The speaker expects Democrats to perform well in the next midterms, with the House likely to change hands and the Senate less certain, adding another layer of uncertainty to the Fed's policy path. The speaker also argues that past political compromises have tended to bring more spending and inflationary, less market-friendly policies.
The episode frames the current inflation problem as a policy conflict: weakening currencies, suppressing bond yields, and supporting asset prices can work against efforts to contain inflation. That tension is compounded by the possibility of oil reaching $100 and by the speaker's forecast that inflation could reach 4%, 5%, or 6% over the next one to two years.
The PPI report was mixed, with core PPI up 0.2% month over month versus 0.3% consensus, but headline PPI hotter and year-over-year inflation near 5%; markets subsequently moved to roughly 70% odds of a Fed hike from about 50-50 a week earlier. The next CPI report was described as decisive, with Waller favoring a hike if CPI exceeds consensus.
The speaker argues that rate hikes are a poor response to an energy supply shock because they do not create more oil and can restrict production; such hikes are often reversed within 12 months. At the same time, suppressing oil prices without changing fundamentals can reduce production incentives and contribute to a later return to high prices.
GEO-POLITICS
“And at the same time too, like so much of that growth is dependent on the AI race and like, yeah, it's a bipartisan hatred of AI right now.”—
TECHNOLOGY
“I think the rate of change, the growth in it is definitely slowing…”—
ECONOMY
“So it's brewing this storm that, you know, he's trying to balance competing goals of keeping inflation in check, you know, not tightening, not allowing financial conditions to tighten to…”—
“You could argue 1 strategy would be to let markets puke into the FOMC to take pressure off, make the market look a little wobblier into that decision and try…”—
“So we, we had it come in a little hot on headline. So core month and month actually came in at 0.2%, slightly below consensus of 0.3%…”—
MARKETS
“Traditionally the long end buybacks have been 2,000,000,000. He said it'd be at a $4,000,000,000 minimum of buybacks. And he came out and announced that it would actually be $6,000,000,000”—
“They started doing this formal intervention in the 160s and we're at 153 right now.”—
“The cure for high prices is high prices, and that brings on more production and you solve the supply shortage…”—
FORECASTS
“Like, yeah, you know, it should not surprise anyone if in the next year or 2 there's 4 or 5, 6 inflation.”—
“The fair value of the 10 year is somewhere around 5.8% right now, roughly speaking, assuming that this 6.6% nominal GDP continues.”—
“Yes, inflation expectations are a bit higher, but the main driver of long bonds recently has been this term premium composition.”—
Intro
The hosts introduce the post–Labor Day roundup, preview upcoming Blockworks conferences, and turn to Scott Bessent’s effort to manage rising Treasury yields.
Can Bessent Beat The Bond Market?
Bessent’s larger Treasury buyback announcement fails to calm the long end, revealing the bond market’s demand for substantially more policy support.
Should The 10-Year Yield Be 5.8%?
A nominal-GDP regression suggests the ten-year Treasury’s fair value could be near 5.8%, challenging Bessent’s ability to suppress long-term yields.
The Inflation-Growth Trap
The speakers argue that political incentives, energy-driven inflation, and financial repression create a dangerous inflation-growth trap ahead of the midterms.
Ads (TOKEN2049, Avalanche)
Token2049 Singapore and Avalanche Summit New York are promoted as upcoming events featuring crypto, finance, technology, and tokenization leaders.
Will The Fed Hike?
After the hot PPI report, market-implied odds of a Fed hike rise to roughly 70%, while the hosts debate whether inflation and politics make action unavoidable.
Is One Credibility Hike Enough?
The speakers consider whether a single credibility or insurance hike could stabilize the long end without signaling a sustained tightening cycle.
Is Economic Growth Peaking?
Three hikes alongside $120 oil would likely create a severe recessionary or crisis-like outcome, making current market pricing difficult to sustain.
Can Debasement Trades Keep Running?
Growth may be peaking as AI infrastructure spending decelerates, real-rate effects accumulate, credit spreads widen, and midterm fiscal support fades.
Is The AI Trade Breaking?
The debasement trade remains fundamentally attractive but faces volatile path risk, while crowded semiconductor positioning may require an extended healing period.
Final Thoughts
The episode concludes that AI backlash, political uncertainty, and crowded momentum trades could force new market leadership before the hosts sign off.
Related Episodes


Important Disclaimers
Not Investment Advice: For education only — not financial, tax or legal advice.
AI-Generated: Made by AI from source transcripts and may contain errors.
No Guarantees: Past performance does not predict future results; investing carries risk.
Our Commentary · Request Removal