PodcastAdam Taggart | Thoughtful Money®Andy Schectman

How Low Will Gold & Silver Go? | Andy Schectman

The conversation centers on a structural shift toward deliverable, non‑rehypothecated gold and silver markets across Asia and the Middle East, supported by alternative payment rails that can bypass USD settlement and are already pulling physical East. Market mechanics—war‑driven oil shocks forcing sales, sizable COMEX takeouts, Shanghai premiums plus VAT arbitrage, and sharp margin hikes—have amplified volatility and tightened physical availability even as central‑bank buying was revised higher. Speakers judge these forces make deep, prolonged collapses unlikely; they expect limited downside (gold briefly below $4,000 would surprise them, silver may bottom near $65) and recommend a pyramid portfolio with a small speculative sleeve for higher‑risk bets.

Preview · 18 more points in the app

Read the Full Summary

Key Takeaways

New physically deliverable gold and silver contracts (kilo bars and 1,000‑oz silver) are being rolled out across Singapore, Shanghai, Dubai and Mumbai and — when combined with persistent Shanghai premiums and VAT/outbound incentives — are sucking metal eastward via alternative payment rails (CIPS and Enbridge) that already enable oil‑for‑yuan‑for‑gold flows; speakers warn that if Western authorities disrupted shipping/payment rails physical trade could stop and global gold prices would spike sharply.

The Iran war has produced a strong inverse oil‑vs‑precious‑metals relationship as higher oil costs forced some countries to sell liquid assets (Russia sold roughly 900,000 oz in the first four months), while much of the recent buying is attributed to large institutions — creating a tug‑of‑war where public/retail selling funds large buyers and amplifies price dislocations.

Invoking Gibson's paradox, speakers argue that prolonged suppression of real (not nominal) interest rates has artificially restrained gold prices, and point to a 69‑month drawdown in the US Treasury total‑return index to claim the dollar/treasury safe‑haven narrative is weakening and algorithmic narratives tying gold only to falling nominal rates are misleading.

Market mechanics — refiners and dealers hedge physical purchases by shorting futures, and sharp margin increases (example cited: ~300% hike into an ETF rebalancing) have forced margin‑call cascades that turn routine hedges into forced selling, a dynamic that helped produce silver's rapid retrace from near $89 to just under $75.

Observable physical tightness — meaningful COMEX deliveries (hundreds of gold contracts, thousands of silver contracts and hundreds of millions of ounces withdrawn year‑to‑date) plus double‑digit Shanghai premiums — underpins the view that substantive downside is limited: speakers would be 'pretty shocked' to see gold below $4,000 for more than a brief moment and expect silver to find a bottom around $65.

GEO-POLITICS

Deliverable Markets — Non‑rehypothecated, deliverable gold and silver contracts (kilo bars, 1,000‑oz silver) are being rolled out in Singapore, Shanghai, Dubai, Mumbai and other venues as physical alternatives to highly financialized COMEX contracts. These markets use alternative payment rails (CIPS and Enbridge) that already link a large share of global GDP and enable direct oil‑for‑yuan‑for‑gold flows that bypass USD settlement. Speakers warn that if Western authorities blocked shipping or payment rails, physical trade could stop and global gold prices would spike sharply.

“This is like the Singapore exchange that in December started selling kilo gold bars, deliverable right away, not rehypothecated and financialized…”—

TECHNOLOGY

Information Overload — Speakers compare technical/wave analysis to high‑frequency trading: participants who anticipate order flow or pattern momentum can capture outsized returns but also amplify crowd‑driven volatility. They note the cadence of negative, market‑relevant news has accelerated from a few items a year to many per day, producing information overload and 'volatility exhaustion' that raises the value of actionable guidance.

“It's just like the whole concept of the book Flash Boys, where the high frequency trading is ahead of the order flow.”—

ECONOMY

Gibson's Paradox — Invoking Gibson's paradox, the speaker emphasizes an inverse relationship between real interest rates and gold. They say prolonged suppression of real (not nominal) rates has artificially restrained gold prices and that freeing real rates would be strongly bullish for gold over the long term.

“Gibson's paradox, which largely speaks to the inverse relationship between real interest rates and the price of gold.”—

MARKETS

Silver Volatility — Silver ran from roughly $35 last year to about $75, a rally driven in part by large non‑retail buyers. That surge prompted selling from older, price‑sensitive holders. Silver futures then retraced from near $89 to just under $75, showing pronounced short‑term volatility and holder concern.

“The day that we're talking right now, silver futures have just cracked below 75 an ounce…”—

Gold Weakness — At the time of discussion gold was showing a 'slow, steady fade' around the mid‑$4,000s, signaling muted near‑term momentum. Speakers view this as a short‑term downtrend within a larger constructive physical backdrop, not the start of a prolonged breakdown.

“Gold is 4,400-ish. So it's kind of on this sort of like slow, steady fade.”—

Shanghai Premiums — Persistent Shanghai premiums—double‑digit on silver and large dollar premiums on gold—combined with VAT rules (VAT paid by recipient on exit) create lucrative arbitrage for sending metal into China. That premium acts as a vacuum, pulling physical from West to East and incentivizing large shipments into China and the Middle East.

“I'm talking the way that the traders look at this with a, you know, a 12% or $9 premium right now in Shanghai on silver or an $85 premium in…”—

FORECASTS

Limited Downside — Speakers expect limited substantive downside for metals: they'd be 'pretty shocked' to see gold fall below $4,000 for more than a very brief moment and think silver might find a bottom around $65 if it dips that far. This view rests on recent patterns of higher lows and structural physical demand.

“I think I heard you say you'd be pretty shocked if gold dropped below $4,000 an ounce. And if it did, you think it'd be there just super quickly…”—

Market Context And Question

Host frames the episode by asking how low gold and silver might go and highlights recent price moves and volatility prompting viewers' concerns.

Volatility Versus Trend

Guest argues the recent choppiness is characteristic of a bull market—higher highs and higher lows—with price-sensitive hands selling into strength.

Physical Flows Eastward

Speakers detail strong flows of physical metal into China, India and the Middle East driven by premiums, VAT quirks, and exchange-for-physical mechanics.

COMEX Mechanics And Deliveries

Discussion of COMEX deliveries, margin hikes, exchange glitches and how those market mechanics amplified volatility and constrained physical availability.

New Non-Rehypothecated Markets

Guest outlines emerging deliverable exchanges and vaults in Asia and the Middle East, plus alternative payment rails enabling settlement outside USD.

Price Suppression And Incentives

Speakers explain why Western paper prices can be suppressed short term and why nations and big buyers prefer physical settlement and accumulation.

How Low Could They Go?

Guest gives his floor estimates: brief dips could test roughly $65 silver and just-under-$4,000 gold, but sustained collapses are unlikely given physical demand.

Investor Action Plan

Recommendation to dollar-cost-average, adopt a pyramid portfolio with a small speculative sleeve (miners/crypto), and consider using trusted dealers for execution.

Related Episodes

Important Disclaimers

Not Investment Advice: For education only — not financial, tax or legal advice.

AI-Generated: Made by AI from source transcripts and may contain errors.

No Guarantees: Past performance does not predict future results; investing carries risk.

Our Commentary · Request Removal