Erlina Yeo Terwelp: From Banking to PE to Family Office to Columbia Endowment
Yeo Terwelp describes how Columbia's endowment evaluates managers and builds portfolios, balancing generalist perspective with specialist focus and using data to assess exposures. She discusses the trade-offs involved in private-market allocations, fund capacity, sector concentration, and venture risk, as well as the importance of trust and execution. Higher rates, she says, make growth and margin expansion more important in buyouts.
Preview · 20 more points in the app
Read the Full SummaryKey Takeaways
Yeo Terwelp says higher interest rates change buyout math and make company growth and margin expansion more important, especially for firms with demonstrated operating value creation. She also cautions that buy-and-build strategies are difficult to execute: successful integration can create exceptional results, but claims of success warrant follow-up questions.
At Columbia, Terwelp's generalist role spanned hedge funds, long-only strategies, private equity, and niche strategies. She says evaluating managers required assessing their edge, positioning, leadership, and execution, while building LP and GP networks was a distinct learning curve after direct investing.
Terwelp says Columbia assessed risk dynamically, using data to evaluate exposures such as equity beta alongside liquidity, cost, and leverage rather than filling preset categories. That discipline sat alongside attention to liquidity as the endowment continued growing its private portfolio, even though public markets had outperformed private markets.
Terwelp describes a trade-off between broad and specialized investing: a generalist perspective helps compare industries and asset classes and recognize when an asset class may not fit, while specialist investing made her more attentive to portfolio construction, tilts, and areas to add. Columbia's senior team later divided responsibility between private and public investments as it addressed diversification needs, including relatively low venture exposure compared with peers.
MARKETS
“The biggest one particularly for buyout is higher interest rates. It makes the math different…”—
“so I graduated in 2006 and 2006 as we all remember was a great year it was actually a great year I my first year in banking we were doing…”—
“So I worked a lot on a lot of different asset classes…”—
Introduction
Yeo Terwelp describes growing up in Singapore with a commodities-trading father and an organizational-behavior scholar mother, whose contrasting styles shaped how she approaches investments and people.
Entry into the investment business
Early exposure to trading and investing at home, followed by a strong interest in economics, led Yeo Terwelp to study at Columbia and pursue investment banking.
Career path from Citi to today
After Citi, Yeo Terwelp gained operational private-equity experience, attended business school, and moved to Houston, where family-office work broadened her investment scope and drew her toward the LP role.
Joining Columbia Endowment process
Yeo Terwelp explains that personal outreach and a genuine interest in Columbia’s educational mission opened conversations with the endowment’s leaders and eventually an interview process.
Early role and portfolio approach at Columbia
She joined Columbia as a generalist, working across public and private strategies while learning its data-intensive, risk-factor-based approach to portfolio allocation.
Manager selection skills and learning curve
Yeo Terwelp says business and manager analysis share core questions about edge, positioning, and people, while LP work required her to build a GP network and learn fund-level portfolio construction.
Risk factor and data-driven portfolio management
Columbia used data to understand portfolio exposures, liquidity, leverage, and equity beta, favoring first-principles analysis over simply filling asset-class or strategy buckets.
Role evolution at the endowment
Her responsibilities shifted toward private markets as Columbia moved to a more specialist structure, with portfolio construction and the development of its private allocation becoming central to her role.
CEO-CIO leadership transition experience
Yeo Terwelp initially found the CIO transition uncertain, but came to value Kim’s new perspective and the specialist model while retaining the benefits of Columbia’s generalist culture.
Current time allocation, privates portfolio
She divides her time among existing managers, new-manager meetings, portfolio research, co-investments, risk decisions, and team leadership.
New manager diligence process
Columbia’s small, communicative team shares early manager discussions, then uses staged one-page, five-page, and investment-proposal reviews to test the key return-driving questions.
Off-list reference checks approach
Yeo Terwelp says investment ideas can come from anyone, and she often joins diligence early enough to shape the central questions, analysis, and reference work.
Exiting manager relationships
Warm relationships and trusted industry connections make off-list references more candid; corroborated negative feedback has led Columbia to reject funds.
Portfolio construction driving exit decisions
Manager exits are emotionally difficult, so Columbia tries to avoid surprises and may part ways over excessive fund growth, weakening organizational alignment, or a loss of trust.
Team delegation as CIO role evolved
Portfolio construction can lead Columbia to limit commitments or reduce exposure in crowded sectors, but these changes usually occur as part of a broader portfolio review.
Liquidity management in private markets
As Columbia adopted specialist deal teams, Yeo Terwelp delegated more underwriting while retaining manager relationships and contributing creatively to the analysis.
Portfolio construction tilts and diversification
Columbia remains committed to private markets and sees room to grow, while monitoring liquidity and emphasizing vintage diversification, particularly amid rapid venture fundraising and valuation increases.
Left tail risks and manager re-underwriting
The endowment evaluates portfolio tilts such as geography, venture stage, manager specialization, and biotech-versus-technology exposure to understand its aggregate bets.
Operational edge in buyout strategies
Higher rates make operating growth and margin expansion more important in buyouts, while concentrated venture holdings raise concerns about correlated bets and groupthink.
Team leadership responsibilities
Columbia re-underwrites managers for the higher-rate environment, prioritizes repeatable operating value creation, and uses a diversified buyout portfolio to balance venture risk.
Mentoring style and team culture
Yeo Terwelp sees specialist firms’ repeated sector experience as a potential operational advantage, while cautioning that buy-and-build strategies are difficult to execute and integrate.
Retaining high performers in flat hierarchies
Investment-team leaders coach direct reports and emphasize understanding individual strengths, giving constructive feedback, and making mentorship part of the team’s everyday culture.
Lessons learned from CIO Kim
Yeo Terwelp views poor fit as a mismatch between a person and a role, and prefers helping people find work suited to their motivations and abilities.
Own career trajectory and aspirations
To retain high performers in a flat hierarchy, she emphasizes autonomy, meaningful responsibility, and learning opportunities rather than relying solely on titles or promotion.
Rapid-fire closing questions
She admires Kim’s authenticity, adaptability, direct communication, and ability to preserve Columbia’s effective practices while introducing new ideas and developing people.
Biggest investment pet peeve
Yeo Terwelp values her Columbia role and its learning opportunities, remains open to future change, and is focused on adapting to AI, higher rates, and evolving investment and leadership demands.
Related Episodes

Important Disclaimers
Not Investment Advice: For education only — not financial, tax or legal advice.
AI-Generated: Made by AI from source transcripts and may contain errors.
No Guarantees: Past performance does not predict future results; investing carries risk.
Our Commentary · Request Removal