Stephanie Pomboy: Rising Bond Yields Are EVERYONE'S Problem
The discussion links geopolitical uncertainty, fiscal borrowing, and rising long-term yields, arguing that forces such as oil prices, reshoring, and potential Japanese Treasury sales are largely beyond the Federal Reserve's direct control. It also questions the durability of AI and equity earnings, citing mark-to-market gains, deferred depreciation, rising credit costs, and real-world constraints on the AI buildout. The speakers expect a difficult reckoning with leverage, malinvestment, and pension shortfalls, while favoring scarce commodities and other hard assets if inflation, deficits, and central-bank balance-sheet expansion intensify.
Preview · 18 more points in the app
Read the Full SummaryKey Takeaways
The AI investment boom is producing earnings that may overstate underlying profitability: Amazon's Anthropic stake reportedly rose from an $8 billion investment to a valuation above $75 billion, but that gain is paper income, while data-center depreciation has not fully reached earnings. At the same time, hyperscalers are issuing more expensive debt and many have negative free cash flow.
AI infrastructure expansion faces both financial and physical constraints. Hyperscalers are competing for increasingly costly capital alongside roughly $10 trillion of federal borrowing needs, while permitted land, water, capacitors, memory chips, and public support may limit the buildout even when financing is available.
The federal government's roughly $10 trillion debt rollover is intensifying competition with private borrowers, and T-bill issuance remains part of the strategy despite Scott Bessent's initial opposition. The resulting funding pressure makes it difficult for policymakers to reduce borrowing costs.
Long-term Treasury yields face upward pressure from rising oil prices, inflationary reshoring, and possible Japanese Treasury sales—forces largely outside the Federal Reserve's direct control. The speakers also point to the Fed's balance sheet, which had expanded by more than $200 billion since December, as its main potential source of market support.
The administration's run-it-hot strategy is intended to use strong growth and capital spending to improve the fiscal picture, but the speakers say the deficit is not shrinking and additional munitions spending would expand fiscal pressure. They therefore expect faster growth and capex could bring forward a cleansing of malinvestment, bad debts, excessive leverage, and inflated valuations.
GEO-POLITICS
“It's crazy to watch the market pingpong back and forth on the headlines that we've reached a deal with Iran. No, we're going to bomb them to hell…”—
TECHNOLOGY
“Take Amazon for example…”—
“Fred is you know pointing out the tremendous depreciation wave that lies ahead for you know all these AI investments, data centers, etc…”—
“These hyperscalers are also issuing debt like crazy and that debt increasing is becoming increasingly expensive because the spreads on this hyperscaler borrowing are starting to widen out around you…”—
ECONOMY
“What you find is that the private sector has borrowed thus far this year the same amount as the federal government which is just mindboggling when you think about the…”—
“We've got, the potential for continuing rising oil prices, which you think is more likely than not. That again creates inflationary pressures, generally drives yields up as well…”—
“I've said for a long time, forget about the Fed funds rate…”—
MARKETS
“It was the worst or the highest bond spike in July since 2005 and it was the highest oil price spike in July in over 30 years.”—
“Someone did a study on the first quarter earnings and suggested I think first quarter S&P earnings were something around 20% growth yearon-year and his analysis showed that you know…”—
FORECASTS
“We don't have a signed agreement and there's nothing to say that a week from now we won't have oil prices back over $85 a barrel.”—
“So will delization I think beget the reverse where rates will slowly just ever so you know each year move higher and higher keep creeping up. Yeah…”—
“As provided that the economy doesn't slow too much, the economic demand for inputs will continue, right?…”—
– Recuperation progress & Wilhelmina’s recovery
Stephanie describes her knee injury and recovery, while Adam and Stephanie discuss Wilhelmina’s successful ACL surgery and their hopes for returning to hiking.
– Adam’s Glacier National Park trip & 25th anniversary
Adam recounts his Glacier National Park vacation, celebrating his 25th wedding anniversary and birthday amid spectacular mountain scenery and smoky conditions.
– Funny “celebrity recognition” story in the park
Adam tells how a chance encounter with someone who recognized him transformed his fellow travelers’ perception of him from ordinary YouTuber to celebrity.
– July’s extreme market moves (NASDAQ, bonds, oil)
July brought an unusually severe combination of NASDAQ weakness, rising Treasury yields, and an oil-price surge, creating multiple market headwinds.
– Market ping-ponging on Iran headlines & strong earnings offset
Markets repeatedly reacted to contradictory Iran headlines, while strong reported corporate earnings gave equity bulls an offset despite algorithmic trading and geopolitical uncertainty.
– Framing the three big issues: stocks, oil, rates
Adam frames the discussion around stock-market optimism, oil’s long-term direction, and the persistent rise in bond yields.
– Fred Hickey’s view on AI earnings quality
Fred Hickey argues that headline AI-company earnings overstate sustainable profitability because mark-to-market gains and understated depreciation distort valuations.
– Mark-to-market gains distorting profits (Amazon/Anthropic example)
Google and Amazon’s Anthropic investments generated enormous paper gains that inflated earnings without providing cash to fund operations, capital spending, or debt service.
– Hyperscalers turning free-cash-flow negative & rising debt costs
Hyperscalers are spending heavily, issuing increasingly expensive debt, and turning free-cash-flow negative, undermining the idea that major S&P companies remain flush with cash.
– How much of S&P earnings growth is just accounting
Mark-to-market accounting may explain much of reported S&P earnings growth, meaning underlying corporate profitability could be roughly half as strong as headline figures suggest.
– Downside risk if AI valuations reverse
If AI valuations reverse, companies such as Amazon and Google could suffer both operational damage and large accounting losses on their technology investments.
– AI CapEx funding risks & capital constraints
Credit markets already show concern through wider spreads and higher default-insurance costs, even as equity investors continue pushing major indexes toward records.
– Corporate issuance now matching federal borrowing needs
The AI buildout faces practical constraints involving land, permits, water, power equipment, chips, public support, and ultimately the availability of financing.
– Share buybacks fading – companies become net equity issuers
Corporate borrowers are competing with the federal government for scarce funding as hyperscalers add debt to a market already facing enormous Treasury refinancing needs.
– Long-end Treasury sell-off & Bank of Japan intervention
Private-sector borrowing has approached federal issuance, creating an unprecedented flood of bonds and intensifying competition for investor capital.
– Why higher-for-longer rates are here to stay
Companies have stopped supporting equities through massive buybacks and are becoming net stock issuers, removing a major long-standing tailwind for the market.
– Fed’s limited ability to control long-term yields
The Treasury market is absorbing a vast supply of government and corporate debt, while investors can increasingly demand better yields and selectivity.
– Quiet balance-sheet expansion despite official rhetoric
Long-term Treasury yields have risen sharply, and Bank of Japan efforts to support the yen may add pressure by selling dollar assets and Treasury holdings.
– Secular deglobalization pushing rates higher over time
Higher-for-longer rates appear entrenched because AI-related borrowing, oil prices, inflation, and Japanese Treasury sales are forces the Federal Reserve cannot directly control.
– Higher inflation/interest rates siphoning liquidity from financial assets
The Fed has limited influence over long-term yields through the policy rate and may ultimately need balance-sheet expansion to stabilize markets burdened by extreme leverage.
– Why hard assets & commodities should outperform
Despite official resistance to renewed quantitative easing, the Federal Reserve balance sheet has already expanded significantly since the latest non-QE program began.
– Next recession deficits & $4 trillion pension underfunding
Deglobalization and reshoring are secular forces that could reverse decades of falling interest rates by reducing demand for dollars and Treasuries while raising production costs.
– Private equity/credit risks & high likelihood of pension bailouts
Higher inflation and borrowing costs consume more of the economy’s marginal liquidity, leaving less available to support stocks, bonds, and other financial assets.
– Social fairness concerns & potential public blowback
Stephanie and Adam argue that investors may need to return to fundamental analysis as easy-money gains fade and companies face structurally higher labor, capital, and input costs.
– Can we still grow our way out (with significant pain)?
Scarce commodities, energy, copper, and other hard assets should benefit from rising economic input demand and the inability to create physical resources through financial issuance.
– The need for a cleansing of excesses before healthier growth
A future recession could expand the federal deficit dramatically and force central-bank balance-sheet growth, increasing competition for scarce hard assets and supporting commodity outperformance.
Related Episodes



Important Disclaimers
Not Investment Advice: For education only — not financial, tax or legal advice.
AI-Generated: Made by AI from source transcripts and may contain errors.
No Guarantees: Past performance does not predict future results; investing carries risk.
Our Commentary · Request Removal